< previous page page_129 next page >

Page 129
Substituting for (t - t0 + 1) in the previous expression we get
C0145-01.gif
This lemma holds a fortiori for any schema x consistently exhibiting an effective rate of increase at least equal to 1, i.e., C0145-05.gif, over the interval (t0, t). As noted first in sections 6.2 and 6.3, when l(x)/l is small, C0145-06.gif will be small and the factor C0145-04.gif will be very close to one. Let x* denote a schema which consistently yields the best observed performance C0145-13.gif, among the schemata which persist over that interval. In all but unusual circumstances C0145-12.gif will exceed C0145-11.gif by more than the factor C0145-04.gif. If l is large this is the more certain since, until the adaptation is far advanced, l(x)/l will with overwhelming probability be smallsee the discussion at the end of section 6.2. Thus, for any x* for which µx* significantly exceeds C0145-10.gif, the number of trials C0145-08.gif allocated to x* is an exponential function of C0145-09.gif.
(For natural systems the reproduction rate is determined by the environmentcf. fitness in geneticshence it cannot be manipulated as a parameter of the adaptive system. However, for artificial systems this is not the case; the adaptive plan can manipulate the observed performance, as a piece of data, to produce more efficient adaptation. In particular, the reproductive step of C0141-04.gif algorithms, step 4, can be modified to assure that the reproduction rate of x* automatically exceeds C0145-07.gif
From all of this it is clear that, whatever the complexity of the function µ, plans of type C0141-04.gif behave in a way much like that dictated by the optimal allocation criterion: the number of trials allocated to the observed best increasing as an exponential function of the total number of trials nx* allocated to structures which are not instances of x*. However we can learn a good deal more by comparing the expected loss per trial of the genetic plans C0141-04.gif to the loss rate under optimal allocation. Theorem 5.3 established a lower bound
C0145-02.gif
for the expected loss under optimal allocation, where b = s1/(µx* - µr). For the genetic plan, the expected loss per trial is bounded above by
C0145-03.gif
where r' is the number of schemata which have received n' or more trials under the genetic plan, and, as in Theorem 5.3, q(Nx*, n') is the probability that a given option other than x* is observed as best. (This expression is simply L'Nr from

 
< previous page page_129 next page >

If you like this book, buy it!